🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned ruling, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to implement a revised congressional boundary scheme that may create as many as five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three decision, handed down on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to lift a lower court's block that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its ruling.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably classified voters by their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to revert to the boundaries established after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

With a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's decision. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its boosted favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

The ruling occurs during a countrywide fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican majority. Usually, boundary revision occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that could add a number of more conservative seats. Democrats, in response, have pushed back with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

Conversely, opposition party officials criticized the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

Another leading Democratic leader argued the court had yet again eroded its credibility by approving a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.